Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 481 - 490 of 992 for blow.

COURT OF APPEALS
hard blows, but not foul ones. See State v. Neuser, 191 Wis. 2d 131, 139, 528 N.W.2d 49 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53151 - 2010-08-10

COURT OF APPEALS
determine which blow constituted battery because unanimity was achieved “as long as the jury agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90233 - 2012-12-10

[PDF] State v. Bret J. Chapin
action. Although the officer indicated in his report that he delivered two closed fist blows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19880 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Tawanna H.
an argument. Tawanna denied the charge, stating that the two were exchanging blows and Michelle knocked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14028 - 2014-09-15

City of Oshkosh v. Christine K. Palecek-Baerwald
do these tests.” Finally the court stated: [T]he final blow is now they all ask individuals to take
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5908 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the winds were blowing approximately twenty to twenty-five miles per hour. It would have been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71242 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gordon Dain
Dain’s consciousness of guilt. Dain argued that he was merely blowing off steam as a result of being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13809 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] City of Oshkosh v. Christine K. Palecek-Baerwald
to reasonably do these tests.” Finally the court stated: [T]he final blow is now they all ask individuals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5908 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to “strike hard blows.” See State v. Neuser, 191 Wis. 2d 131, 139, 528 N.W.2d 49 (Ct. App. 1995) (citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57804 - 2010-12-20

State v. Guenther Kirchhuebel
was attempting to suck air in, rather than blowing a breath sample into the PBT, and that he was “playing a game
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13966 - 2005-03-31