Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 481 - 490 of 1781 for cm.
Search results 481 - 490 of 1781 for cm.
[PDF]
State v. Willie E. Willis
provision is now § 961.41(1m)(cm)2. No. 96-0192-CR -2- controlled substance, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10279 - 2017-09-20
provision is now § 961.41(1m)(cm)2. No. 96-0192-CR -2- controlled substance, contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10279 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Felten
-9 99-CM-406 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3917 - 2017-09-20
-9 99-CM-406 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3917 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)2. (2013- 14), 939.50(3)(e) (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252498 - 2020-01-13
and five years of extended supervision. See WIS. STAT. §§ 961.41(1)(cm)2. (2013- 14), 939.50(3)(e) (2013
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252498 - 2020-01-13
State v. Constantino Elmer Miranda
. Appeal No. 02-2319-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CM-116 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5609 - 2005-03-31
. Appeal No. 02-2319-CR Cir. Ct. No. 02-CM-116 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT III
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5609 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[with] a separate disorderly conduct charge and conviction in Buffalo County Case No. 21-CM-67, and in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
[with] a separate disorderly conduct charge and conviction in Buffalo County Case No. 21-CM-67, and in connection
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886969 - 2024-12-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a sentence that is not bifurcated. See WIS. STAT. §§ 302.045(2)(c)- (cm), 302.05(3)(a)1.-2. A challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330423 - 2021-02-02
a sentence that is not bifurcated. See WIS. STAT. §§ 302.045(2)(c)- (cm), 302.05(3)(a)1.-2. A challenge
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=330423 - 2021-02-02
State v. David Karich
for “possession of cocaine” contrary to § 161.41(1m)(cm), Stats. However, that statute number is for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
for “possession of cocaine” contrary to § 161.41(1m)(cm), Stats. However, that statute number is for possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10870 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Felten
-9 99-CM-406 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3918 - 2017-09-20
-9 99-CM-406 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3918 - 2017-09-20
State v. Romaine A. Langham
Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)2, unlawfully possessing tetrahydrocannabinols, see § 961.41(3g)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)2, unlawfully possessing tetrahydrocannabinols, see § 961.41(3g)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25668 - 2006-07-25
State v. Robert L. Dumas
a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, contrary to § 161.41(1m)(cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
a judgment convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver, contrary to § 161.41(1m)(cm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31