Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 481 - 490 of 29410 for er.
Search results 481 - 490 of 29410 for er.
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by finding the refusal reasonable because Bunnell improperly refused to submit to a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
erred by finding the refusal reasonable because Bunnell improperly refused to submit to a chemical test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89341 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Amanda’s share would be based on 18 years of service, the circuit court erred by reading the phrase “18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
that Amanda’s share would be based on 18 years of service, the circuit court erred by reading the phrase “18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to arrest him for operating while under the influence; and (2) the circuit court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
to arrest him for operating while under the influence; and (2) the circuit court erred in admitting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
of discretion. Cindy contends that the trial court erred in determining Brian’s gross income and by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14064 - 2014-09-15
of discretion. Cindy contends that the trial court erred in determining Brian’s gross income and by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14064 - 2014-09-15
Renaissance Faire Limited Partnership v. Welding Services Group
the trial court erred in not deciding as a matter of law whether the May 1st agreement satisfied the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9925 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erred in not deciding as a matter of law whether the May 1st agreement satisfied the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9925 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that Amanda’s share would be based on 18 years of service, the circuit court erred by reading the phrase “18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
that Amanda’s share would be based on 18 years of service, the circuit court erred by reading the phrase “18
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993201 - 2025-08-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because the circuit court erred by: (1) excluding expert witness evidence the Bickfords offered after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84545 - 2014-09-15
because the circuit court erred by: (1) excluding expert witness evidence the Bickfords offered after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84545 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to give the castle doctrine jury instruction; (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504215 - 2022-04-05
that: (1) the trial court erred by failing to give the castle doctrine jury instruction; (2) trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=504215 - 2022-04-05
COURT OF APPEALS
. The Bickfords contend that they are entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erred by: (1) excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84545 - 2012-07-11
. The Bickfords contend that they are entitled to a new trial because the circuit court erred by: (1) excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84545 - 2012-07-11
Cindy Brenengen v. Brian D. Brenengen
. Cindy contends that the trial court erred in determining Brian’s gross income and by failing to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31
. Cindy contends that the trial court erred in determining Brian’s gross income and by failing to award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14064 - 2005-03-31