Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 481 - 490 of 81648 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 481 - 490 of 81648 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Howard M. v. Jean R.
the Barstad test follows. We therefore affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31
the Barstad test follows. We therefore affirm. By the Court.—Order affirmed. No. 94
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7832 - 2005-03-31
State v. Steven E. Benz
an order concluding that Steven Benz properly refused to submit to a blood test under § 343.305(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13221 - 2005-03-31
an order concluding that Steven Benz properly refused to submit to a blood test under § 343.305(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13221 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark David Hayter
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Crawford County: Robert p. vandehey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6040 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Crawford County: Robert p. vandehey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6040 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark David Hayter
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Crawford County: Robert p. vandehey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5882 - 2005-03-31
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Crawford County: Robert p. vandehey, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5882 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARK A. SANDERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: MARK A. SANDERS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=318262 - 2020-12-29
CA Blank Order
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2014AP2071-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139662 - 2015-04-08
notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2014AP2071-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139662 - 2015-04-08
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
. Was suppression of the blood test results improper because the police officer who ordered the blood draw relied
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346859 - 2021-03-15
. Was suppression of the blood test results improper because the police officer who ordered the blood draw relied
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=346859 - 2021-03-15
State v. Luther Williams
in the drug identification section of the crime lab who performed the peer review on the tests the analyst
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
in the drug identification section of the crime lab who performed the peer review on the tests the analyst
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16440 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2013AP488-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108349 - 2017-09-21
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2013AP488-CRNM State of Wisconsin v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108349 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 161
authority to order a DNA sample. The court subsequently held a hearing on Nickel’s motion on May 21, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56896 - 2014-09-15
authority to order a DNA sample. The court subsequently held a hearing on Nickel’s motion on May 21, 2009
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56896 - 2014-09-15