Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4801 - 4810 of 24750 for extending.
Search results 4801 - 4810 of 24750 for extending.
[MS WORD]
PR-1834: Order for Extension of Time
Administration Case No. The court reviewed the Petition requesting the court extend the time
/formdisplay/PR-1834.doc?formNumber=PR-1834&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2018-09-05
Administration Case No. The court reviewed the Petition requesting the court extend the time
/formdisplay/PR-1834.doc?formNumber=PR-1834&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2018-09-05
[PDF]
2015 OWI Guidelines District 5
with up to 3 years maximum Extended Supervision: Maximum 3 years Fines: Mandatory minimum $600 up
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
with up to 3 years maximum Extended Supervision: Maximum 3 years Fines: Mandatory minimum $600 up
/publications/fees/docs/d5owi2015.pdf - 2015-09-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
imposed fifteen years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Garcia appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
imposed fifteen years of initial confinement and eight years of extended supervision. Garcia appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728139 - 2023-11-14
Timothy J. Lipke v. Tri-County Area School Board
. In his brief to the trial court, Lipke argued that § 801.15(5), Stats., extended the applicable statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
. In his brief to the trial court, Lipke argued that § 801.15(5), Stats., extended the applicable statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to recommend no more than 10.5 years’ initial confinement and 9.5 years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
to recommend no more than 10.5 years’ initial confinement and 9.5 years’ extended supervision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=461543 - 2021-12-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 2017, we notified T.D. of counsel’s no-merit report and extended the time for T.D. to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195057 - 2017-09-21
, 2017, we notified T.D. of counsel’s no-merit report and extended the time for T.D. to file a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195057 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the applicable deadlines or found good cause to extend them.” Further, Amanda G. did not object to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
the applicable deadlines or found good cause to extend them.” Further, Amanda G. did not object to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114758 - 2014-06-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision.2 The court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19
years of initial confinement and ten years of extended supervision.2 The court determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916439 - 2025-02-19
Joan M. Kudlick v. James E. Bivens
, planted seven hundred pine and spruce trees along the driveway, a portion of which extended over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7359 - 2005-03-31
, planted seven hundred pine and spruce trees along the driveway, a portion of which extended over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
term of imprisonment bifurcated as ten years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27
term of imprisonment bifurcated as ten years of initial confinement and four years of extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=768603 - 2024-02-27