Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48011 - 48020 of 84282 for case number.
Search results 48011 - 48020 of 84282 for case number.
[PDF]
Carol L. Dodge v. James M. Schneider
affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 This case involves a boundary dispute between Dodge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7250 - 2017-09-20
affirm the judgment of the circuit court. ¶2 This case involves a boundary dispute between Dodge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7250 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be pursued on appeal. We therefore summarily affirm. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CF3635
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
be pursued on appeal. We therefore summarily affirm. Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CF3635
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138551 - 2015-03-31
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138551 - 2015-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James G. Freer
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case. 1 Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6330 - 2017-09-19
and frustrated a fair presentation of the case. 1 Id. ¶4 Turning to the first factor, the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6330 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170309 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2013-14). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170309 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102475 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dennis C. Gandy
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, P.J.[1] The issue in this case is whether Dennis C. Gandy, who was cited for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16159 - 2005-03-31
Talib Amin Akbar v. Stephen Kronzer
2004 WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-3148 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7071 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 108 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-3148 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7071 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition, and we summarily affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=848040 - 2024-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
plea. On October 28, 2014, Sheedy wrote the court and asked to reopen his case, though he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142621 - 2017-09-21
plea. On October 28, 2014, Sheedy wrote the court and asked to reopen his case, though he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142621 - 2017-09-21