Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48021 - 48030 of 82666 for judgment for m s.

[MS WORD] GF-150: Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act Declaration
assigned; otherwise, leave case number blank. The clerk will add this. Enter the name(s
/formdisplay/GF-150.doc?formNumber=GF-150&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2026-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, collectively “Coolidge”) appeal from orders granting summary judgment in favor of the City of Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264798 - 2020-06-24

WI App 65 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP878 Complete Title o...
judgment in a prior case in which AEGIS, Arby, and WPS were defendants. ¶2 We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63042 - 2012-01-22

[PDF] WI App 65
barred AEGIS’s claim against Arby because of the stipulated judgment in a prior case in which AEGIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63042 - 2014-09-15

2009 WI APP 162
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: john a. franke, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41727 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 14
on the brief of Alan M. Levy of Lindner & Marsack, S.C., Milwaukee. On behalf of the defendant-respondent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57990 - 2014-09-15

State v. Peter Kienitz
by Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was James E. Doyle, attorney
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17267 - 2005-03-31

2011 WI APP 14
of the defendant-respondent Scott Walker, the cause was submitted on the brief of Alan M. Levy of Lindner & Marsack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57990 - 2011-02-09

[PDF] State v. Peter Kienitz
by Mary E. Waitrovich. For the defendant-appellant-petitioner the cause was argued by Marguerite M
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17267 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
was unconstitutionally vague because the statute does not define Jensen?s duties as a public officer. The Court
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=127&year=2009