Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48021 - 48030 of 51987 for legal separation.
Search results 48021 - 48030 of 51987 for legal separation.
[PDF]
State v. Calvin R. Herzog
was only 18, and one was 19 at the time of the stop, that neither one could legally transport intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
was only 18, and one was 19 at the time of the stop, that neither one could legally transport intoxicants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25607 - 2017-09-21
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
that the physician’s opinion was not in legal terms but only constituted a medical opinion that the injuries were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
that the physician’s opinion was not in legal terms but only constituted a medical opinion that the injuries were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L.
if the juvenile court applied the wrong legal standard or did not ground its decision on a logical interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31
if the juvenile court applied the wrong legal standard or did not ground its decision on a logical interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13015 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Mr. Baker sit up within his vehicle … and slowly drive away.” This argument ignores the legal test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
Mr. Baker sit up within his vehicle … and slowly drive away.” This argument ignores the legal test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97503 - 2013-05-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
of reasonable suspicion is not “‘readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.’” The manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26846 - 2006-10-18
of reasonable suspicion is not “‘readily, or even usefully, reduced to a neat set of legal rules.’” The manner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26846 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
State v. Karl M. Gebhard
was not in legal terms but only constituted a medical opinion that the injuries were serious. Expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
was not in legal terms but only constituted a medical opinion that the injuries were serious. Expert testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12298 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
ruling.). We turn to those arguments. ¶17 Rhodes contends that “the police cannot legally search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234884 - 2019-02-20
ruling.). We turn to those arguments. ¶17 Rhodes contends that “the police cannot legally search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234884 - 2019-02-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is conclusory; he develops no legal argument analogizing this case to any other where judicial bias
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219736 - 2018-09-26
is conclusory; he develops no legal argument analogizing this case to any other where judicial bias
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219736 - 2018-09-26
State v. Mark R. Norlander
to legal authority will not be considered.”) If he were correct, no defendant could be convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
to legal authority will not be considered.”) If he were correct, no defendant could be convicted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18379 - 2005-05-31
[PDF]
State v. Gilbert H. Butzlaff
erroneously exercised its discretion or applied the wrong legal standard, we will reverse the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10904 - 2017-09-20
erroneously exercised its discretion or applied the wrong legal standard, we will reverse the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10904 - 2017-09-20