Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 25682 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 25682 for bench warrant/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
). 00-2220-CR 00-2221-CR 2 search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search of Jansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2924 - 2017-09-19
). 00-2220-CR 00-2221-CR 2 search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search of Jansen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2924 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
of his home, whether a subsequently issued search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
of his home, whether a subsequently issued search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
of his home, whether a subsequently issued search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2923 - 2005-03-31
of his home, whether a subsequently issued search warrant was proper, and whether a pat-down search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2923 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher Bunten
granting Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5527 - 2005-03-31
granting Christopher Bunten’s motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5527 - 2005-03-31
State v. Lance R. Ward
of his residence was improper because the search warrant application did not provide sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
of his residence was improper because the search warrant application did not provide sufficient facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion to suppress because the warrant used to search his cell phone was facially invalid. Lor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
motion to suppress because the warrant used to search his cell phone was facially invalid. Lor also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=689320 - 2023-08-15
[PDF]
State v. Bobby R. Dabney
)(a), 940.225(1)(b) and 939.63 (2001-02). 1 Dabney contends that the complaint and arrest warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5656 - 2017-09-19
)(a), 940.225(1)(b) and 939.63 (2001-02). 1 Dabney contends that the complaint and arrest warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5656 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bobby R. Dabney
)(a), 940.225(1)(b) and 939.63 (2001-02).[1] Dabney contends that the complaint and arrest warrant in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5656 - 2005-03-31
)(a), 940.225(1)(b) and 939.63 (2001-02).[1] Dabney contends that the complaint and arrest warrant in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5656 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testing of his blood should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380917 - 2021-06-24
testing of his blood should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=380917 - 2021-06-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Newsom argues: (1) the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212773 - 2018-05-15
court’s order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Newsom argues: (1) the search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212773 - 2018-05-15