Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 62305 for child support.

Marathon County v. Faye P.
or services may be established by a showing of all of the following: (a) That the child has been adjudged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9895 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
acknowledged his paternity and had taken steps to avoid paying child support. Mosher also reiterated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96917 - 2013-05-14

[PDF] State v. Roger H. Splitt
of one count of sexual contact with a child as a persistent repeat offender, and one count of repeated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3073 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
an examination of the record shows that the finding is supported by the record and is not clearly erroneous. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82387 - 2012-05-15

[PDF] Marathon County v. Faye P.
of the following: (a) That the child has been adjudged to be in need of protection or services and placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9895 - 2017-09-19

State v. Roger H. Splitt
was convicted after a jury trial of one count of sexual contact with a child as a persistent repeat offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3073 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
because an examination of the record shows that the finding is supported by the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82387 - 2014-09-15

Wisconsin Court System - Wisconsin Commission on Children, Families and the Courts
on Children, Families and the Courts Wisconsin Judicial Committee on Child Welfare Other Chief Justice's COVID
/courts/committees/ccipcommission.htm - 2026-02-22

COURT OF APPEALS
child. The three older children were removed from Lisa B.’s custody. Two were adopted, and the third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29136 - 2007-05-21

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Yolanda M.
defective” because the petitions stated that her children were not subject to the Federal Indian Child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2364 - 2005-03-31