Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 69092 for he.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 69092 for he.
COURT OF APPEALS
-medical touching of the patients’ legs that must “cease” and that he “failed to give adequate warning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
-medical touching of the patients’ legs that must “cease” and that he “failed to give adequate warning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70385 - 2011-08-31
[PDF]
WI 40
of law in September 1990. He has operated his own legal practice in Manitowoc. He has not previously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996930 - 2025-08-14
of law in September 1990. He has operated his own legal practice in Manitowoc. He has not previously
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=996930 - 2025-08-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue at trial was whether Gomoll was acting in self-defense. Gomoll argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228649 - 2018-11-28
. The issue at trial was whether Gomoll was acting in self-defense. Gomoll argues that he was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228649 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
abused the child; Matthew testified at the trial he had not abused his son. The CHIPS order placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26935 - 2014-09-15
abused the child; Matthew testified at the trial he had not abused his son. The CHIPS order placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26935 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
or the court as to who abused the child; Matthew testified at the trial he had not abused his son. The CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26935 - 2006-11-05
or the court as to who abused the child; Matthew testified at the trial he had not abused his son. The CHIPS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26935 - 2006-11-05
[PDF]
State v. MC Winston
. No. 03-3412-CR 2 STAT. § 948.02(2) (2001–02). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7167 - 2017-09-20
. No. 03-3412-CR 2 STAT. § 948.02(2) (2001–02). 1 He also appeals from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7167 - 2017-09-20
State v. MC Winston
).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Winston claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7167 - 2005-03-31
).[1] He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Winston claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7167 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David R. Melstrand
for possession of marijuana, speeding and driving without a license. He argues that he consented only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4345 - 2017-09-19
for possession of marijuana, speeding and driving without a license. He argues that he consented only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4345 - 2017-09-19
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He argues that tools discovered by police while searching his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8533 - 2005-03-31
a judgment convicting him of burglary. He argues that tools discovered by police while searching his car
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8533 - 2005-03-31
State v. Garland G. Babaian
. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Garland G. Babaian appeals from a judgment entered after he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3150 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 WEDEMEYER, P.J.[1] Garland G. Babaian appeals from a judgment entered after he pled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3150 - 2005-03-31