Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 4811 - 4820 of 58483 for speedy trial.
John D. May v. Joseph F. Cusick, M.D.
a jury trial, of their medical malpractice suit against Dr. Joseph Cusick, the Medical College
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16033 - 2005-03-31
a jury trial, of their medical malpractice suit against Dr. Joseph Cusick, the Medical College
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16033 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John D. May v. Joseph F. Cusick, M.D.
the dismissal, following a jury trial, of their medical malpractice suit against Dr. Joseph Cusick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16033 - 2017-09-21
the dismissal, following a jury trial, of their medical malpractice suit against Dr. Joseph Cusick
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16033 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kraig V. Carter
the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it failed to adequately explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it failed to adequately explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
(Kortsch).2 Moore, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3064 - 2017-09-19
(Kortsch).2 Moore, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3064 - 2017-09-19
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order in the first action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3063 - 2005-03-31
, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order in the first action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3063 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Bobby R. Williams
2 Williams’s motion to withdraw his plea. 1 Williams claims that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19729 - 2017-09-21
2 Williams’s motion to withdraw his plea. 1 Williams claims that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19729 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial due to the ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248916 - 2019-10-17
denying his postconviction motion seeking a new trial due to the ineffective assistance of counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248916 - 2019-10-17
State v. Anthony Murray
on the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
on the alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9682 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. The trial court denied both motions. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
. The trial court denied both motions. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02