Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48101 - 48110 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 48101 - 48110 of 60098 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to evaluate claims of multiplicity: (1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact; and (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174935 - 2017-09-21
to evaluate claims of multiplicity: (1) whether the charged offenses are identical in law and fact; and (2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on time, three times. And, while Williamson claims to have a disability herself, she does not tell us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170700 - 2017-09-21
on time, three times. And, while Williamson claims to have a disability herself, she does not tell us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170700 - 2017-09-21
Dave Flores v. Jack Raz
that Flores and Montoto could recover the monies paid in contemplation of the sale under a claim for “unjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
that Flores and Montoto could recover the monies paid in contemplation of the sale under a claim for “unjust
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3884 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that should be analyzed: whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that insufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128232 - 2017-09-21
that should be analyzed: whether there is any arguable merit to a claim that insufficient evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=128232 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott Development Company, L.L.C. v. State of Wisconsin-Department of Transportation
testified that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15949 - 2017-09-21
testified that the remaining property’s value was reduced after the taking. Scott claims, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15949 - 2017-09-21
Patrick L. Wolfe v. Melanie A. Wolfe
misconstrued Wis. Stat. § 767.24(4) (1997-98).[1] Specifically, Melanie claims that the court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
misconstrued Wis. Stat. § 767.24(4) (1997-98).[1] Specifically, Melanie claims that the court erred by failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15905 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
by Jones, and the circuit court conducted a hearing to consider the claim. ¶4 Armond Pride
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
by Jones, and the circuit court conducted a hearing to consider the claim. ¶4 Armond Pride
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88418 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the postconviction motion, the trial court noted the holding in Schell, but claimed that the holding did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27305 - 2014-09-15
the postconviction motion, the trial court noted the holding in Schell, but claimed that the holding did not apply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27305 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott Elvers
, where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel underpins a request for withdrawal of a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21
, where a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel underpins a request for withdrawal of a plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19978 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and “improper favoritism inherent in the ‘reserve juror’ system,” but then withdrew these claims after further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594879 - 2022-11-29
” and “improper favoritism inherent in the ‘reserve juror’ system,” but then withdrew these claims after further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594879 - 2022-11-29