Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48111 - 48120 of 74849 for public records.
Search results 48111 - 48120 of 74849 for public records.
CA Blank Order
809.32(1)(e), (f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116989 - 2014-07-15
809.32(1)(e), (f). Upon consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116989 - 2014-07-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
motion requesting 498 days of sentencing credit. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261533 - 2020-05-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record. Therefore, certiorari review would not be available for that issue. ¶6 Although Stokes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
in the record. Therefore, certiorari review would not be available for that issue. ¶6 Although Stokes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51520 - 2010-06-30
CA Blank Order
and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133046 - 2015-01-12
and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133046 - 2015-01-12
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93169 - 2013-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210223 - 2018-03-22
the entire record, as well as the no- merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210223 - 2018-03-22
[PDF]
Darrell E. Beth v. Margaret R. Beth
of the record pursuant to RULE 809.16(1), STATS. However, the transcript was never filed in this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12340 - 2017-09-21
of the record pursuant to RULE 809.16(1), STATS. However, the transcript was never filed in this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12340 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Luke C. Anderson
motion to withdraw the no contest plea, 2 Anderson argued that the record contains no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21
motion to withdraw the no contest plea, 2 Anderson argued that the record contains no support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20861 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responses. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the records, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281801 - 2020-08-26
responses. Counsel then filed a supplemental no-merit report. After reviewing the records, counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=281801 - 2020-08-26