Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48121 - 48130 of 68502 for did.

[PDF] State v. Lee Anton Jackson
is factored into this in terms of [the court’s] thinking. However, the judgment of conviction did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10749 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Community Financial Services Center Corporation v. Carl Rucker
on appeal. The trial court found that Rucker did not have an arguably meritorious issue on appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7325 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Matthew E. Haas
. The truck did not have its lights on. Rybarik followed with his overhead lights and siren activated. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19944 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the terms of the Stipulation” because he did not vacate the apartment when he was supposed to under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77510 - 2012-02-06

CA Blank Order
. The circuit court did not address Wojtalewicz during the plea colloquy regarding the impact of the read
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127803 - 2014-11-18

Hector R. Figueroa, Jr. v. Medical Group of West Allis
. Additionally, even if we were to construe (as did the trial court) Figueroa's claims of criminal violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9514 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
did not file a forfeiture action, the circuit court must order the return of his money. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48709 - 2010-04-05

Janice Johnson Kuhn v. Fitzgerald
, which did not include fidelity coverage. ¶3 Kuhn was convicted of four counts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15432 - 2005-03-31

Heather R. Nugent v. Charles A. Slaght
by that date. American Family did not receive the premium payment, and on July 22, 1996, it recorded in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5999 - 2005-03-31

Marathon County Department of Social Services v. Eli J. O., Sr.
Dispositional Order; and (2) the court did not have sufficient evidence on which to base a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19562 - 2005-09-12