Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48121 - 48130 of 83395 for simple case search.
Search results 48121 - 48130 of 83395 for simple case search.
[PDF]
State v. James D. Luedtke
to withdraw his plea and received hearings on both. In each case, Luedtke alleged that he was intimidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10779 - 2017-09-20
to withdraw his plea and received hearings on both. In each case, Luedtke alleged that he was intimidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10779 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
as Przytarski in light of the fact that this case is one of many actions Przytarski has brought, many of them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171630 - 2017-09-21
as Przytarski in light of the fact that this case is one of many actions Przytarski has brought, many of them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Sister Mary Felten v. Frank A. Dolezal
case in which Dolezal was a party. On December 22, 1993, Judge Michael T. Kirchman was assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7770 - 2017-09-19
case in which Dolezal was a party. On December 22, 1993, Judge Michael T. Kirchman was assigned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7770 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, finding that it was a continuation of an earlier case that had been dismissed and was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484228 - 2022-02-16
, finding that it was a continuation of an earlier case that had been dismissed and was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484228 - 2022-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(am). In this case, the circuit court entered an order, which stated that “[t]he subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589683 - 2022-11-15
)(am). In this case, the circuit court entered an order, which stated that “[t]he subject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=589683 - 2022-11-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
burglary conviction. No. 2012AP2142-CR 2 that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107629 - 2017-09-21
burglary conviction. No. 2012AP2142-CR 2 that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107629 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806594 - 2024-05-29
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806594 - 2024-05-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the facts of this case and the circuit court explained the reasons for its rulings in detail. There would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
of the facts of this case and the circuit court explained the reasons for its rulings in detail. There would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=458943 - 2021-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
robbery, until his resentencing in the instant case on February 23, 2017. Finally, on December 19, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416785 - 2021-08-31
robbery, until his resentencing in the instant case on February 23, 2017. Finally, on December 19, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=416785 - 2021-08-31