Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48141 - 48150 of 75049 for judgment for us.
Search results 48141 - 48150 of 75049 for judgment for us.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the court was not required to use the repeater enhancement to sentence Simpson for the total length
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223420 - 2018-10-17
the court was not required to use the repeater enhancement to sentence Simpson for the total length
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223420 - 2018-10-17
James Ferron v. State of Wisconsin Department of Transportation
if it examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11339 - 2011-10-18
if it examined the relevant facts, applied a proper standard of law, and, using a demonstrated rational process
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11339 - 2011-10-18
[PDF]
Vera Flanagan v. City of New London
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7713 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7713 - 2017-09-19
Vera Flanagan v. City of New London
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Waupaca County: PHILIP M. KIRK, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Milwaukee Area Technical College v. Gerhardt J. Steinke
. STEINKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10725 - 2017-09-20
. STEINKE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10725 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2011-01-19
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Forest County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59100 - 2011-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
-Appellant, Finkbiner, Duffy & Clapp, S.C., Defendant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
-Appellant, Finkbiner, Duffy & Clapp, S.C., Defendant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106335 - 2014-01-06
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
(collectively “the Thomases”), pro se, appeal a summary judgment dismissing their medical malpractice suit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112555 - 2014-05-13
(collectively “the Thomases”), pro se, appeal a summary judgment dismissing their medical malpractice suit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112555 - 2014-05-13
[PDF]
State v. David R. Bjerkaas
from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: MICHAEL J. MULROY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21
from a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse County: MICHAEL J. MULROY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16092 - 2017-09-21