Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48171 - 48180 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48171 - 48180 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
State v. Paul Matek
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3524
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
remanded. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] This case involves various statutes in the Wisconsin Consumer Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
remanded. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] This case involves various statutes in the Wisconsin Consumer Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28910 - 2007-05-08
State v. Melvin H. Van Zeeland
. Procedural Posture This case has a lengthy and confusing procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2015-06-14
. Procedural Posture This case has a lengthy and confusing procedural history
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14399 - 2015-06-14
COURT OF APPEALS
At the sentencing hearing, Greenwood’s counsel explained that, as a result of this case, Greenwood’s extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
At the sentencing hearing, Greenwood’s counsel explained that, as a result of this case, Greenwood’s extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143667 - 2015-06-29
State v. Margaret H.
. Although this case was prosecuted as a termination-of-parental rights matter, it is, in essence, a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15591 - 2005-03-31
. Although this case was prosecuted as a termination-of-parental rights matter, it is, in essence, a custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15591 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County Department of Human Services v. Patricia S.
The parties have provided this court with the case’s context by comprehensively recounting the factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3508 - 2017-09-19
The parties have provided this court with the case’s context by comprehensively recounting the factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3508 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 No. 2020AP1039-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402470 - 2021-07-30
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 No. 2020AP1039-CR
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=402470 - 2021-07-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
phone number and Johnson’s phone number. ¶4 Miller pled not guilty. The case was tried before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187361 - 2017-09-21
phone number and Johnson’s phone number. ¶4 Miller pled not guilty. The case was tried before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187361 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not and that Kaleb was guilty of disorderly conduct. The court stated: [I]f this is going to be a test case, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104910 - 2017-09-21
was not and that Kaleb was guilty of disorderly conduct. The court stated: [I]f this is going to be a test case, I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104910 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Seth P. Hartigan
2005 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-2118-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16803 - 2017-09-21
2005 WI 3 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 03-2118-D COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16803 - 2017-09-21