Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48171 - 48180 of 59634 for quit claim deed/1000.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing Kinney. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909870 - 2025-02-04

Dawn Garcia v. Janet Giesen
as the designated beneficiary arose from her presence at the meeting. Garcia claims that Jerome’s actions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6096 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
this claim. Furthermore, a mere change in earning capacity, without a change in actual earnings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884944 - 2024-12-03

COURT OF APPEALS
to provide a reasoned basis for its reconfinement decision.” He makes this claim based on the court’s heavy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60273 - 2011-02-22

[PDF] State v. Lance L. Egner
discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges are multiplicitous. See State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7156 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
“to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Dolores Demir v. Ahmet Demir
support responsibilities by claiming that the mortgage and utility payments were sufficient for credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9731 - 2017-09-19

Melody Knudson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
that panel dismissed Knudson’s claim for failure to prosecute, State Farm moved to confirm that determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15696 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that, if Bryson wished to continue to pursue his claim, he would have to file a new action in the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=789491 - 2024-04-18

CA Blank Order
of counsel claim requires a defendant to prove both deficient performance and prejudice. Strickland v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93192 - 2013-02-18