Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48181 - 48190 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48181 - 48190 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
was currently serving on a homicide case; and eight years’ initial confinement and five years’ extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140093 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the circuit court’s factual findings, EBA Design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82635 - 2012-05-16
facts of this case. BACKGROUND ¶2 According to the circuit court’s factual findings, EBA Design
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82635 - 2012-05-16
State v. Trentt O. Kinison
that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests carry a ‘prima facie presumption of accuracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7454 - 2005-03-31
that “[u]nder Wisconsin case law, breathalyzer tests carry a ‘prima facie presumption of accuracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7454 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Olmstead has failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2014-03-18
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. Because Olmstead has failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109035 - 2014-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798466 - 2024-05-14
State v. Sherman Williams
. Williams was charged and the case was tried to a jury. Prior to trial, Williams moved to exclude reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9024 - 2005-03-31
. Williams was charged and the case was tried to a jury. Prior to trial, Williams moved to exclude reference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9024 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109971 - 2014-04-02
for postconviction relief. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109971 - 2014-04-02
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
. ¶1 FINE, J. This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65110 - 2011-05-31
Robert B. Ciarpaglini v. Kelly Flury
and the case was again assigned to Judge Welker in Rock County. On April 3, 1996, Judge
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10723 - 2005-03-31
and the case was again assigned to Judge Welker in Rock County. On April 3, 1996, Judge
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967). The no-merit report sets forth the procedural history of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238272 - 2019-03-27

