Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48191 - 48200 of 68502 for did.

State v. Charles F. G.
anyone had touched her, Avanee stated “Poppa did … right here.” After further questioning, Avanee stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5620 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 5, 2013 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
the circuit court made, not for findings it could have made but did not. Dickman v. Vollmer, 2007 WI App 141
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101634 - 2013-09-04

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that: (1) he did not need a conditional use permit to operate his business; (2) his use of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4758 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that: (1) he did not need a conditional use permit to operate his business; (2) his use of the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4768 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
back in her trust account to close the estates. ¶11 Schmidt stated that she did not believe she had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32206 - 2008-03-20

Vincent J. Guerrero v. Patricia M. Cavey
was incapable of waiving. The circuit court noted a conflict, but it did not disqualify Cavey because attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15869 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, after becoming aware of its initial error, the court did not alter its order requiring the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612015 - 2023-01-20

[PDF]
a facial challenge, unlike the ordinance in Patel that did not itself authorize any constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990239 - 2025-07-29

[PDF] Randy A. J. v. Norma I. J.
with the child. Brendan was served with notice of the temporary order hearing, but did not appear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4959 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an opinion about who was driving the vehicle did not disqualify him as an expert under § 907.02(1), which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171747 - 2017-09-21