Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on parole, Stanton was placed in custody for causing injury while driving under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78137 - 2014-09-15
on parole, Stanton was placed in custody for causing injury while driving under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=78137 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in custody for causing injury while driving under the influence. That accident led to the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78137 - 2012-02-15
in custody for causing injury while driving under the influence. That accident led to the revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78137 - 2012-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Mylea Wirkus
. No. 2005AP2652 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1 Following the denial of her motion to suppress evidence of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2005AP2652 2 ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J. 1 Following the denial of her motion to suppress evidence of her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
State v. Mylea Wirkus
: ROBERT J. WIRTZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
: ROBERT J. WIRTZ, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NETTESHEIM, J.[1] Following the denial of her motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21671 - 2006-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Anderson then filed a motion for reconsideration in this action. The reconsideration court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216568 - 2018-07-31
. Anderson then filed a motion for reconsideration in this action. The reconsideration court denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216568 - 2018-07-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
information. Sheila filed a motion to reconsider, which was denied pursuant to a written decision. Sheila
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74244 - 2014-09-15
information. Sheila filed a motion to reconsider, which was denied pursuant to a written decision. Sheila
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74244 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was denied. In its decision denying that motion, the court elaborated on its reasoning, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101555 - 2017-09-21
was denied. In its decision denying that motion, the court elaborated on its reasoning, explaining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101555 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
that Sheila had failed to provide a full exchange of financial information. Sheila filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21
that Sheila had failed to provide a full exchange of financial information. Sheila filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74244 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss and read-in the remaining charges. The parties also agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
to dismiss and read-in the remaining charges. The parties also agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss and read-in the remaining charges. The parties also agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01
to dismiss and read-in the remaining charges. The parties also agreed to make a joint recommendation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794946 - 2024-05-01