Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 64825 for records.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 64825 for records.
State v. Brian S.
court's exercise of discretion, we first look to the record to see if discretion was in fact exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10233 - 2005-03-31
court's exercise of discretion, we first look to the record to see if discretion was in fact exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
review of the record, we reject Abkar's contention that he was denied his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8862 - 2017-09-19
review of the record, we reject Abkar's contention that he was denied his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8862 - 2017-09-19
Robert D. Harmon v. J. Fiers
responsible for avoiding [a bed sore are unknown, but are] mentioned in Dr. Harmon's medical records." We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8698 - 2005-03-31
responsible for avoiding [a bed sore are unknown, but are] mentioned in Dr. Harmon's medical records." We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8698 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Talib Amin Akbar
review of the record, we reject Abkar's contention that he was denied his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8863 - 2017-09-19
review of the record, we reject Abkar's contention that he was denied his right to self-representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8863 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with prejudice and ordering Tadisch to pay Birschbach’s attorney fees “for the reasons set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247014 - 2019-09-25
with prejudice and ordering Tadisch to pay Birschbach’s attorney fees “for the reasons set forth on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247014 - 2019-09-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2016AP2479-CRNM 2 no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197597 - 2017-10-11
. No. 2016AP2479-CRNM 2 no-merit report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197597 - 2017-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 and has not filed a response. Based on the report and an independent review of the record, I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546567 - 2022-07-21
2 and has not filed a response. Based on the report and an independent review of the record, I
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546567 - 2022-07-21
State v. Robert J. Olds
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10756 - 2005-03-31
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796479 - 2024-05-07
the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796479 - 2024-05-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796479 - 2024-05-07
the record and the no-merit report, as mandated by Anders. We conclude that there are no issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=796479 - 2024-05-07