Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 4821 - 4830 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order in the first action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3063 - 2005-03-31
, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order in the first action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3063 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28982 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
Brenda Moore v. M.J. Kortsch
(Kortsch).2 Moore, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3064 - 2017-09-19
(Kortsch).2 Moore, acting pro se, does not actually dispute the trial court’s dismissal order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3064 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Murray
of counsel. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
of counsel. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing on his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9682 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
PER CURIAM. Lenzy Wilson appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28982 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
. The trial court denied both motions. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
. The trial court denied both motions. The case proceeded to trial. Zabala did not testify in his own
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95094 - 2013-04-02
State v. Kraig V. Carter
the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it failed to adequately explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion because it failed to adequately explain why
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20323 - 2008-08-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and five years of extended supervision. At sentencing, the trial court considered the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208887 - 2018-02-22
and five years of extended supervision. At sentencing, the trial court considered the parties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208887 - 2018-02-22
[PDF]
State v. Matthew H. Kiefer
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when: (1) at sentencing, it stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26362 - 2017-09-21
argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when: (1) at sentencing, it stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation was violated when the trial court1 denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04
argues that his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation was violated when the trial court1 denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572415 - 2022-10-04