Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48201 - 48210 of 83389 for simple case search.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at No. 2017AP984-CR 2 conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212980 - 2018-05-15

CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[2
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101975 - 2013-09-11

[PDF] NOTICE
relies solely on State v. Lucas, 2006 WI App 112, 293 Wis. 2d 781, 718 N.W.2d 184. In that case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30401 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Leonard Collins, Sr.
matter jurisdiction in his case and that he was denied counsel at critical stages of the proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19873 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
a violation of the first rule. The case proceeded to a review hearing where the circuit court found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93985 - 2014-09-15

State v. James W.
in this case. ¶6 The facts in this case demonstrate that the child, Jamie, had special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7254 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the criminal case was resolved, the forfeiture case proceeded. ¶4 Rivamonte testified, as did Peloza’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95461 - 2013-04-15

State v. Leonard Collins, Sr.
be released from prison because the trial court lacked personal and subject matter jurisdiction in his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19873 - 2005-10-10

County of Marquette v. Robert DeWitz
in this case, the circuit court had before it evidence that the wall was not a deliberate violation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25188 - 2006-05-17

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124594 - 2017-09-21