Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48211 - 48220 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48211 - 48220 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13541 - 2005-03-31
2006 WI App 223
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27132 - 2006-11-09
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27132 - 2006-11-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
claims. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶¶26-30, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105570 - 2017-09-21
claims. State v. Arends, 2010 WI 46, ¶¶26-30, 325 Wis. 2d 1, 784 N.W.2d 513
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105570 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the circuit court judge’s decision not to disqualify himself, Rhonda’s claim for recusal was based on WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110999 - 2017-09-21
to the circuit court judge’s decision not to disqualify himself, Rhonda’s claim for recusal was based on WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110999 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jewel C.
was ten to fourteen years ago. Now, Jewel claims that this was plain error which prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
was ten to fourteen years ago. Now, Jewel claims that this was plain error which prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
outweighs the finality of judgments; [4] whether there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and [5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97884 - 2013-06-11
outweighs the finality of judgments; [4] whether there is a meritorious defense to the claim; and [5
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97884 - 2013-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
claiming his rights were violated because of the July 29 stipulation. The administrative law judge issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2010-12-20
claiming his rights were violated because of the July 29 stipulation. The administrative law judge issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58067 - 2010-12-20
CA Blank Order
was nonconsensual, there is no arguable merit to a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
was nonconsensual, there is no arguable merit to a claim that trial counsel was ineffective for not challenging
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123440 - 2014-10-14
[PDF]
Jodine Y. Taylor v. Terry L. Taylor
judgment from Jodine Taylor, claiming the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6907 - 2017-09-20
judgment from Jodine Taylor, claiming the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6907 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
findings defeat LaFave's claim of a manifest injustice, we affirm the judgment and order. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8696 - 2017-09-19
findings defeat LaFave's claim of a manifest injustice, we affirm the judgment and order. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8696 - 2017-09-19