Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48211 - 48220 of 74848 for public records.
Search results 48211 - 48220 of 74848 for public records.
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Clarence E. Pelton
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
reviewed the entire record de novo to rule out the possibility of error. We conclude that the sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11795 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491195 - 2022-03-08
of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised on appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491195 - 2022-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP812-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469558 - 2022-01-12
. No. 2021AP812-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=469558 - 2022-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2021AP1924-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
. No. 2021AP1924-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644643 - 2023-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
discipline decision. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166798 - 2017-09-21
discipline decision. Based on our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=166798 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293191 - 2020-10-01
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293191 - 2020-10-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
order.2 After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473641 - 2022-01-19
order.2 After reviewing the record and counsel’s reports, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=473641 - 2022-01-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
-CRNM 2 disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. After our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456079 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244061 - 2019-07-24
of the no-merit report and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244061 - 2019-07-24