Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48221 - 48230 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48221 - 48230 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.
State v. Jewel C.
was ten to fourteen years ago. Now, Jewel claims that this was plain error which prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
was ten to fourteen years ago. Now, Jewel claims that this was plain error which prejudiced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4094 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
used to enhance his penalty; whether there was a Riverside2 violation; and if Felella’s claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256676 - 2020-03-16
used to enhance his penalty; whether there was a Riverside2 violation; and if Felella’s claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256676 - 2020-03-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the time limit and no objection was made. There is no arguable merit to any claim related to the failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109052 - 2017-09-21
the time limit and no objection was made. There is no arguable merit to any claim related to the failure
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109052 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not specifically address it, we also conclude there would be no arguable merit to any claim that Champion did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
not specifically address it, we also conclude there would be no arguable merit to any claim that Champion did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252370 - 2020-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
nevertheless claimed he would not have entered his pleas had he actually seen the report. ¶6 In turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69566 - 2011-08-15
nevertheless claimed he would not have entered his pleas had he actually seen the report. ¶6 In turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69566 - 2011-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2680 2 Lenz disputed his 2012 state tax refund. TAC denied his claim as frivolous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142800 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2680 2 Lenz disputed his 2012 state tax refund. TAC denied his claim as frivolous
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
testimony and defense counsel’s statements that blood was not found where T.B. had claimed blood would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92258 - 2014-09-15
testimony and defense counsel’s statements that blood was not found where T.B. had claimed blood would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92258 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what Bennett claims his attorney should have done differently. Bennett also argues that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
what Bennett claims his attorney should have done differently. Bennett also argues that his counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
to a claim that the sentence was unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App 181, ¶21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259154 - 2020-04-30
CA Blank Order
sued both the Buss & Burleson corporation and Burleson personally. The claim was that they failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107717 - 2014-01-30
sued both the Buss & Burleson corporation and Burleson personally. The claim was that they failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107717 - 2014-01-30