Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48221 - 48230 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 48221 - 48230 of 69135 for as he.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to modify sentence. He contends that he is entitled to resentencing because his sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110340 - 2017-09-21
to modify sentence. He contends that he is entitled to resentencing because his sentence was unduly harsh
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110340 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
similar to the charged conduct in this case. In essence, he is relying on the difference between
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323840 - 2021-01-14
similar to the charged conduct in this case. In essence, he is relying on the difference between
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=323840 - 2021-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
intentional homicide. Haydon contends that he is entitled to a new trial based on the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101618 - 2013-09-04
intentional homicide. Haydon contends that he is entitled to a new trial based on the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101618 - 2013-09-04
COURT OF APPEALS
concedes he failed to raise this argument below, he nevertheless urges this court to address the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33768 - 2008-08-18
concedes he failed to raise this argument below, he nevertheless urges this court to address the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33768 - 2008-08-18
State v. James Arnold
PER CURIAM. James Arnold appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. James Arnold appeals from the judgment of conviction entered against him. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6723 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
registry, and violating a condition of lifetime supervision.2 He was accused of failing to comply
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338312 - 2021-02-24
registry, and violating a condition of lifetime supervision.2 He was accused of failing to comply
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=338312 - 2021-02-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss on the ground that Nowicki was not a proper party to the litigation because he was deceased
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219647 - 2018-09-20
to dismiss on the ground that Nowicki was not a proper party to the litigation because he was deceased
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219647 - 2018-09-20
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
to inform Conwell of all of the constitutional rights he was waiving and the maximum penalty to which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96279 - 2014-09-15
to inform Conwell of all of the constitutional rights he was waiving and the maximum penalty to which he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96279 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it was being driven by Yealey, who had a revoked driver’s license. Yealey informed the officer that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108208 - 2017-09-21
it was being driven by Yealey, who had a revoked driver’s license. Yealey informed the officer that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
and was sentenced to twenty years in prison. He did not pursue an appeal under WIS. STAT. § 974.02 or WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21
and was sentenced to twenty years in prison. He did not pursue an appeal under WIS. STAT. § 974.02 or WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15241 - 2017-09-21