Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 59254 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel E. La Fave
findings defeat LaFave's claim of a manifest injustice, we affirm the judgment and order. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8695 - 2017-09-19
findings defeat LaFave's claim of a manifest injustice, we affirm the judgment and order. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8695 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights.” County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional rights.” County of Racine v. Smith, 122 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64001 - 2011-05-11
City of Chilton v. Ricki D. Bunnell
, it cannot reasonably be claimed that the trial court’s failure to suppress the breath test was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12085 - 2005-03-31
, it cannot reasonably be claimed that the trial court’s failure to suppress the breath test was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12085 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and possession of a firearm by a felon. In 2004, Brooks filed a motion for a new trial claiming ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123537 - 2014-10-14
and possession of a firearm by a felon. In 2004, Brooks filed a motion for a new trial claiming ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123537 - 2014-10-14
CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
Wis. 2d 594, 716 N.W.2d 906. There is no arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court failed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104336 - 2013-11-11
Mary E. Haun v. Thomas V. Rankin, M.D.
because Haun’s only claim was that Rankin performed unnecessary surgery and unnecessary surgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3327 - 2005-03-31
because Haun’s only claim was that Rankin performed unnecessary surgery and unnecessary surgery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3327 - 2005-03-31
October Table of Unpublished Opinions
and for this reason may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20276 - 2005-11-13
and for this reason may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20276 - 2005-11-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, we are unable to determine exactly what Bennett claims his attorney should have done differently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
, we are unable to determine exactly what Bennett claims his attorney should have done differently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113196 - 2014-05-28
State v. Charles Garven
the notes in bad faith. This claim must also fail. For the reasons stated previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11722 - 2005-03-31
the notes in bad faith. This claim must also fail. For the reasons stated previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11722 - 2005-03-31
Barry L. Ball v. Matthew Frank
Ball next claims the adjustment committee failed to determine the identity or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22
Ball next claims the adjustment committee failed to determine the identity or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21513 - 2006-02-22