Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 74508 for a ha.

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Petitioners' Response to Respondents' Motion for Reconsideration of January 11, 2024 Order
rejected in denying their initial motion for reconsideration. Nothing has changed since. Movants cite
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_012624petitionersresponse.pdf - 2024-01-26

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - March 2021
the investigative stop at issue. The State has petitioned for the Supreme Court for review, claiming
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343380 - 2021-03-03

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December 2018
, presiding. This case presents the question of whether West Bend Mutual Insurance Co. has a “duty
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229248 - 2018-11-30

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - September 29, 2020
registration list.” Section 6.50(3), which has been in effect for multiple decades, states that “[u]pon
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291659 - 2020-09-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the project that has already been performed on some of the buildings.) Spring Creek admitted in its Answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1044745 - 2025-12-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
exercise of discretion. Id. The defendant has the burden of demonstrating “both the existence of a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86665 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Julia’s attorney responded with the following: “[f]or the record, I would just note that [Julia] has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=787729 - 2024-04-16

State v. Michael L. Morris
mother and stepfather at sentencing. II. DISCUSSION ¶7 “A defendant has a due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3614 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and he “struggle[d] to understand the impact that [domestic violence] has had on the children,” who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532006 - 2022-06-14

State v. John Tereschko
constitute a violation of the open meetings law. The problem with this approach is that neither party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3351 - 2005-03-31