Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 69135 for as he.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 69135 for as he.
COURT OF APPEALS
his motion for sentence modification. Winius argues he is entitled to sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74538 - 2011-11-28
his motion for sentence modification. Winius argues he is entitled to sentence modification based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74538 - 2011-11-28
[PDF]
May a judge testify at a Canadian administrative tribunal hearing on behalf of an interest group which seeks a binding administrative rule declaring that the Canadian Human Rights Act applies to the Canadian judiciary?
the meaning of SCR 60.03(2). The judge is proposed as a witness not only because he is a judge, but also
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876 - 2017-09-20
the meaning of SCR 60.03(2). The judge is proposed as a witness not only because he is a judge, but also
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Section 974.06 also prevents Ruehl from raising issues that he could have raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61048 - 2014-09-15
. Section 974.06 also prevents Ruehl from raising issues that he could have raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=61048 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not bar recovery for personal injuries he suffered while in the custody of DOC. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113773 - 2017-09-21
not bar recovery for personal injuries he suffered while in the custody of DOC. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113773 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a criminal judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. Haydon contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101618 - 2017-09-21
a criminal judgment convicting him of first-degree intentional homicide. Haydon contends that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101618 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
court erred in denying his petition because he is indigent and will prevail on appeal. Based upon our
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=794198 - 2024-05-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2023AP2329-CR 2 2003CF133. Phiffer contended in this motion that he had been “improperly kept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
2023AP2329-CR 2 2003CF133. Phiffer contended in this motion that he had been “improperly kept
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1036839 - 2025-11-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96337 - 2014-09-15
filed a response claiming he is entitled to additional sentence credit. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96337 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the motion. Stewart now appeals. “[T]he circuit court’s denial of a motion to vacate under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252352 - 2020-01-09
the motion. Stewart now appeals. “[T]he circuit court’s denial of a motion to vacate under WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252352 - 2020-01-09
Jim Mattson v. Thomas O. Schultz
of the Mattsons' claims that Schultz was negligent and inadequate in preparing their case, that he told them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31
of the Mattsons' claims that Schultz was negligent and inadequate in preparing their case, that he told them
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9817 - 2005-03-31