Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
concurrently with the sentence for a bail jumping conviction imposed in another Oconto County case. Payne’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75275 - 2011-12-19
State v. Hans Gerger
unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. ¶9 In this case, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
unless they are clearly erroneous. See id. ¶9 In this case, the circuit court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329157 - 2021-02-02
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=329157 - 2021-02-02
Stacy L. Blunt v. Byran Bartow
the case. He claimed therefore, that he was denied his right to appeal. On September 8, 2004, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25051 - 2006-05-08
the case. He claimed therefore, that he was denied his right to appeal. On September 8, 2004, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25051 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
State v. David Scott Mathis
court found: In this particular case, first of all, the Court notes, one, it may not even have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3074 - 2017-09-19
court found: In this particular case, first of all, the Court notes, one, it may not even have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3074 - 2017-09-19
Ellen M. Gleason v. Richard J. Gleason
Richard raised in the first appeal from this case. By summary order, we conclusively determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
Richard raised in the first appeal from this case. By summary order, we conclusively determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5162 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Cherry similarly mandates a reversal in this case. ¶5 James is wrong. Cherry is not a procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44169 - 2009-12-07
, Cherry similarly mandates a reversal in this case. ¶5 James is wrong. Cherry is not a procedural
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44169 - 2009-12-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record, we have determined this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213697 - 2018-06-05
reviewing the record, we have determined this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213697 - 2018-06-05
Amusement Devices, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
a penalty for neglect. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns whether Amusement Devices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
a penalty for neglect. We affirm. ¶2 This case concerns whether Amusement Devices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3246 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375334 - 2021-06-09