Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 61554 for judgment.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 61554 for judgment.
State v. Kevin M. Salm
judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 11:30 p.m. on April 23, 1998, Deputy Scott Johnston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15446 - 2005-03-31
judgment. I. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 11:30 p.m. on April 23, 1998, Deputy Scott Johnston
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15446 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gregg S. Pate
. Pate, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13431 - 2005-03-31
. Pate, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13431 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: ROBERT J. KENNEDY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: ROBERT J. KENNEDY, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72351 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
including tax liens and civil judgments, and other debts. Based on those findings, the referee's first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21
including tax liens and civil judgments, and other debts. Based on those findings, the referee's first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. John P. Baumgartner
compensation for court-appointed attorneys; (4) vacating a void judgment because the court had no authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
compensation for court-appointed attorneys; (4) vacating a void judgment because the court had no authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44868 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
The Baraboo National Bank v. State
. The State disagreed, claiming that it retained its interest by operation of law. On summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19
. The State disagreed, claiming that it retained its interest by operation of law. On summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8561 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the maximum allowed by law. ¶16 We observe that the amended judgment of conviction erroneously shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33246 - 2014-09-15
the maximum allowed by law. ¶16 We observe that the amended judgment of conviction erroneously shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33246 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jonathan P. Cole
the complaint when probable cause is not found. The judgment roll entry clearly states that “Court reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
the complaint when probable cause is not found. The judgment roll entry clearly states that “Court reviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13217 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21
will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44868 - 2009-12-21