Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 74848 for public records.
Search results 48231 - 48240 of 74848 for public records.
John C. Koshick v. State
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
, as the date for Koshick to file his brief. The next event shown in the record is that on September 15, 2000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3241 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
. No. 2023AP2167-CRNM 2 review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910733 - 2025-02-06
State v. David E.V.
)(a), Stats. Second, he contends the record fails to establish that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8962 - 2005-03-31
)(a), Stats. Second, he contends the record fails to establish that he knowingly and voluntarily waived his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8962 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2012AP2214-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105864 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2012AP2214-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105864 - 2017-09-21
State v. James R. Thiel
Trawitzki, 244 Wis. 2d 523, ¶19. To the extent that a trial judge wishes to introduce into the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31
Trawitzki, 244 Wis. 2d 523, ¶19. To the extent that a trial judge wishes to introduce into the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16516 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
against them. In support, the grandparents allege that the court conducted a “non-recorded telephonic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147251 - 2015-08-26
against them. In support, the grandparents allege that the court conducted a “non-recorded telephonic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147251 - 2015-08-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a postsentence motion for plea withdrawal will be affirmed if the record shows that legal standards were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42294 - 2009-10-20
a postsentence motion for plea withdrawal will be affirmed if the record shows that legal standards were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=42294 - 2009-10-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
wrongly denied his pretrial motion for plea withdrawal. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250788 - 2019-11-26
wrongly denied his pretrial motion for plea withdrawal. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250788 - 2019-11-26
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Ira R. Banks
816 (1987). We do value any analysis that the trial court has placed in the record. We shall affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7426 - 2005-03-31
816 (1987). We do value any analysis that the trial court has placed in the record. We shall affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7426 - 2005-03-31