Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48271 - 48280 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 48271 - 48280 of 59281 for SMALL CLAIMS.
CA Blank Order
and no objection was made. There is no arguable merit to any claim related to the failure to comply
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97348 - 2013-05-28
and no objection was made. There is no arguable merit to any claim related to the failure to comply
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97348 - 2013-05-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
This is not a run-of-the-mill appeal where a defendant claims there is insufficient evidence to support damages
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149676 - 2017-09-21
This is not a run-of-the-mill appeal where a defendant claims there is insufficient evidence to support damages
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149676 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Verne J. Stark
of driving while intoxicated. Even so, the phone tip from another motorist was not anonymous, as claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5781 - 2017-09-19
of driving while intoxicated. Even so, the phone tip from another motorist was not anonymous, as claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5781 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Fox River Condominium Assoc. v. Townhomes of River Place
. The Association acknowledges that we need not address its claim for prejudgment interest if we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25592 - 2017-09-21
. The Association acknowledges that we need not address its claim for prejudgment interest if we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether to hear permissive appeals denying motions to dismiss based on double jeopardy claims, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
whether to hear permissive appeals denying motions to dismiss based on double jeopardy claims, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=950146 - 2025-04-30
State v. Scott A. Magnuson
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13253 - 2005-03-31
, the record belies his claim. Magnuson’s probation officer set forth the recommendation in the presentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13253 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry R. Holmon
assault as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2762 - 2005-03-31
assault as a repeat offender, and from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2762 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
State v. Christopher L.
hearing. His seemingly inconsistent answers given within moments of each other create a plausible claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7233 - 2005-03-31
hearing. His seemingly inconsistent answers given within moments of each other create a plausible claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7233 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
-96). In addressing Vanhof’s claim, LIRC concluded that para. (a) of that subsection could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16291 - 2017-09-21
-96). In addressing Vanhof’s claim, LIRC concluded that para. (a) of that subsection could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16291 - 2017-09-21