Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48271 - 48280 of 68502 for did.

Frontsheet
administrative proceedings pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 227.57(7).[9] ¶18 We conclude, as did the court of appeals
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91482 - 2013-02-28

[PDF] Robert Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.
in architecture, nor a license or registration to that effect with the state, and did not recall whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25578 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
uniformity violation, and did not appraise the Property or offer an opinion of its market value. Landretti
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737692 - 2023-12-12

James Cape & Sons Company v. Terrence D. Mulcahy
In this case, the DOT did not properly consider Cape's request to withdraw because it conditioned Cape's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19023 - 2005-07-14

[PDF] WI APP 29
properly applied to his case. As a result, the circuit court did not reach Hailes’ remaining arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654144 - 2023-07-12

[PDF] Jackson County v. State of Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
in its nonpayment of real estate taxes and did not redeem the tax certificate, in 2002 the county clerk
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25863 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] James Cape & Sons Company v. Terrence D. Mulcahy
neglect and thus entitled to the return of the bond. ¶6 In this case, the DOT did not properly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19023 - 2017-09-21

99-CV-2959 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v.
., dissents (opinion filed). Not Participating: ABRAHAMSON, C.J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16526 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 7
on November 13, 2009, but did not go into effect until February 1, 2010. Like the parties
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91482 - 2014-09-15

Frontsheet
the defendant asserts that the charges were "dismissed outright"? 2. Did the circuit court consider
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84985 - 2012-07-16