Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48271 - 48280 of 82944 for simple case search.
Search results 48271 - 48280 of 82944 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 4 We observe that Wilder initiated two direct appeals in this case. After he filed his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
. 4 We observe that Wilder initiated two direct appeals in this case. After he filed his first
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502779 - 2022-04-05
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138490 - 2015-04-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[1] We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138490 - 2015-04-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
was not negligent in seeking evidence; (3) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88418 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
favorable—plea offer to resolve his case. ¶2 The postconviction court found that the “theoretical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227061 - 2018-11-20
favorable—plea offer to resolve his case. ¶2 The postconviction court found that the “theoretical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=227061 - 2018-11-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that this case is similar to State v. Barrett, 96 Wis. 2d 174, 182, 291 N.W.2d 498 (1980), where the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88622 - 2014-09-15
that this case is similar to State v. Barrett, 96 Wis. 2d 174, 182, 291 N.W.2d 498 (1980), where the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88622 - 2014-09-15
Jeffrey A. Smith v. Menard, Inc.
to the circuit court under the informal evidentiary procedures of small claims cases. See Wis. Stat. § 799.209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2005-03-31
to the circuit court under the informal evidentiary procedures of small claims cases. See Wis. Stat. § 799.209
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7265 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The first issue in this case is the proper construction of Wis. Stat. § 69.18(4). The proper construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39620 - 2009-08-18
The first issue in this case is the proper construction of Wis. Stat. § 69.18(4). The proper construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39620 - 2009-08-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
to say that the State offered no evidence of the items’ value in this case. There was testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174362 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Andre D. Crockett
2001 WI App 235 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3053
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3247 - 2017-09-19
2001 WI App 235 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 00-3053
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3247 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
undermined the case’s outcome. The appellant “must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02
undermined the case’s outcome. The appellant “must show that there is a reasonable probability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33877 - 2008-09-02