Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48281 - 48290 of 74507 for a ha.

[PDF] Janet M. Evans v. Timothy D. Heitman, M.D.
, the trial court concluded: 1. Plaintiff has failed to sustain her burden of proof, to a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14112 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Nadaniel P. Jones
supreme court has stated that “all occupants of a vehicle possess a reasonable expectation of privacy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19583 - 2017-09-21

State v. Patrice M. Ehrenberger
, such a search can be conducted if incident to arrest or if a police officer has probable cause to arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15078 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the court must address when determining whether there has been a Confrontation Clause violation is whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30565 - 2007-10-16

COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel has two parts: (1) deficient performance by counsel and (2) prejudice resulting from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103683 - 2013-10-30

State v. Sol Coleman, Jr.
of the information, along with 18 pages of police reports, which are all the reports the State currently has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8083 - 2005-03-31

Outagamie County v. Karen C.
Based on his assessment of Karen’s language function and capabilities, Sayer concluded that Karen “has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4556 - 2005-03-31

James Reese v. City of Pewaukee
. (a) A claim for an excessive assessment may be filed against the taxation district, or the county that has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3780 - 2005-03-31

State v. Victoria L. Quaerna
of imposing penalties. [5] This court, and in particular the author of this opinion, has commented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14495 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, under § 806.07, the motion has to be made within a reasonable time; and here, the second motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35497 - 2009-02-09