Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4831 - 4840 of 61886 for does.

Charita S.C. v. Tommy S.C.
was mean and "daddy … sucked her 'peepee.'" She testified that the child is afraid of her father and does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11631 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that no factual basis for his plea exists, because the theft of telephone services (which he admitted) does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34305 - 2008-11-13

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in that conduct, close quote, does that section direct us to consider intent? ... They are referring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213100 - 2018-08-31

[PDF] Dennis L. Jacobson v. American Tool Companies, Inc.
(1993). If a circuit court does not expressly make a finding about the credibility of a witness, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12824 - 2017-09-21

Kraft Foods, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
, with the number of days dependant on an employee’s length of service.[2] Paid sick leave does not begin until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2817 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, because the theft of telephone services (which he admitted) does not fall within the definition
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34640 - 2008-11-13

State v. Thomas R. Galecke
neglected that first consideration of seriousness of the crime…. .... So the Court does intend to impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18817 - 2005-07-26

WI App 32 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1022-CR Complete Title...
on this appeal does not challenge that there was sufficient evidence that he sold heroin to the victim shortly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106992 - 2014-03-25

[PDF] Charita S.C. v. Tommy S.C.
'peepee.'" She testified that the child is afraid of her father and does not want to see him.2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11631 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenneth Dwight Spaulding
.) Spaulding’s reply brief does not contradict the State’s characterization of his argument. Thus, we analyze his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16321 - 2005-03-31