Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48311 - 48320 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
Search results 48311 - 48320 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
State v. Esther T.
to Deon R.D., Jr. Esther claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
to Deon R.D., Jr. Esther claims the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it terminated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4354 - 2005-03-31
Julie Casper v. Bayfield County Board of Adjustment
judgment. She claims that a zoning committee member’s comment showed that its decision was predetermined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5199 - 2005-03-31
judgment. She claims that a zoning committee member’s comment showed that its decision was predetermined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5199 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
dismissing the action. Roberts moved for reconsideration, claiming that he had not been served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
CA Blank Order
regarding grounds for termination of her parental rights. There is also no arguable merit to any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
regarding grounds for termination of her parental rights. There is also no arguable merit to any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103416 - 2013-10-28
CA Blank Order
claiming that he misunderstood any information on it. See State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis. 2d 823, 827-28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95127 - 2013-04-03
claiming that he misunderstood any information on it. See State v. Moederndorfer, 141 Wis. 2d 823, 827-28
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95127 - 2013-04-03
[PDF]
State v. Charles Garven
destroyed the notes in bad faith. This claim must also fail. For the reasons stated previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
destroyed the notes in bad faith. This claim must also fail. For the reasons stated previously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11722 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The circuit court rejected this claim in a written order in February 2023, and again in April 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
. The circuit court rejected this claim in a written order in February 2023, and again in April 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806865 - 2024-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal based on the assessment of mandatory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218704 - 2018-09-12
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Peter James Nickitas
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
Nickitas does not claim any of the extenuating circumstances articulated in SCR 22.22(3)(a)-(c).[3
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21691 - 2006-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
interpretation of a comment Leach had made as being racist. Neither claim has any merit. First, as the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102254 - 2017-09-21
interpretation of a comment Leach had made as being racist. Neither claim has any merit. First, as the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102254 - 2017-09-21