Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48321 - 48330 of 69368 for as he.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). Thompson contends that the first “new factor” is a portion of the prosecutor’s sentencing argument. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
right to a file a response to the report, and he has not filed a response. Pursuant to an order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593465 - 2022-11-22

State v. Steven J. Zack
to his probation agent, his probation was revoked and he was returned to court for sentencing in January
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
McMorris remains subject to the unambiguous 2011 sentence structure, and he has not yet completed his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209570 - 2018-03-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of THC and bail jumping. He also appeals an order denying his Nos. 2013AP1930-CR, 2013AP1931-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David L.s.
a response. He has not responded. From our independent review of the record, we conclude that Gaskell
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8796 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
appeals pro se an order denying his second Wis. Stat. § 974.06 postconviction motion. He argues that his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91266 - 2013-01-02

[PDF] CA Blank Order
prosecution agreement (DPA). He also appeals from a judgment sentencing him following the revocation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235314 - 2019-02-20

COURT OF APPEALS
also prevents Ruehl from raising issues that he could have raised in his no-merit response, absent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61048 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, or that the traffic stop was made within 1,000 feet of a school. He argues that the evidence shows no more than
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175031 - 2017-09-21