Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48331 - 48340 of 74848 for public records.
Search results 48331 - 48340 of 74848 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a hearing.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
a hearing.1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=815692 - 2024-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), the State “had to authenticate the documentation by the testimony of the custodian of the records or his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007417 - 2025-09-10
), the State “had to authenticate the documentation by the testimony of the custodian of the records or his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007417 - 2025-09-10
State v. Mark Nelson
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3959 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Robinson provided further information on the record about the actions he took in regard to his medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
Robinson provided further information on the record about the actions he took in regard to his medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144390 - 2015-07-13
[PDF]
State v. Chaz M.
relied upon untrustworthy hearsay. In considering this issue, we have looked at the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3596 - 2017-09-19
relied upon untrustworthy hearsay. In considering this issue, we have looked at the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3596 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
will first recite the facts as found by the small claims court and backed by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33690 - 2014-09-15
will first recite the facts as found by the small claims court and backed by the record. The record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33690 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” “The purpose of the writ is to give the [circuit] court an opportunity to correct its own record of an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
.” “The purpose of the writ is to give the [circuit] court an opportunity to correct its own record of an error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=777747 - 2024-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the facts in the record, no reasonable court could have concluded that termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289479 - 2020-09-22
the facts in the record, no reasonable court could have concluded that termination of parental rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=289479 - 2020-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact, or presents only conclusionary allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116663 - 2017-09-21
of fact, or presents only conclusionary allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116663 - 2017-09-21
Peter L. Walls v. Pamela A. Walls
to uphold a discretionary determination if it can independently conclude that the facts of record applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31
to uphold a discretionary determination if it can independently conclude that the facts of record applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10316 - 2005-03-31