Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48351 - 48360 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 48351 - 48360 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their initials or names. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given preference and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
their initials or names. 3 Cases appealed under WIS. STAT. RULE 809.107 “shall be given preference and shall
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546154 - 2022-07-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).1 The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15
to WIS. STAT. § 948.02(1) (2003-04).1 The case was originally scheduled for a jury trial, then changed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” and there is no definition of that phrase in statutes or in case law. The circuit court rejected these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247564 - 2020-11-19
,” and there is no definition of that phrase in statutes or in case law. The circuit court rejected these arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247564 - 2020-11-19
State v. Robert K. Rymer
, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). The case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2014-01-12
, 127, 449 N.W.2d 845 (1990). The case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2014-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
) the evidence is material to an issue in the case; and (4) the evidence is not merely cumulative.’” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82115 - 2012-05-07
COURT OF APPEALS
.” At the motion hearing, the court determined it had jurisdiction over the case, the complaint was specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64627 - 2011-05-23
.” At the motion hearing, the court determined it had jurisdiction over the case, the complaint was specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64627 - 2011-05-23
Armando Trevino v. Ladd & Milaeger
, he was able to have the sentence reduced to seventeen years’ imprisonment.[1] ¶3 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31
, he was able to have the sentence reduced to seventeen years’ imprisonment.[1] ¶3 In this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule 16-04 Allan Koritzinsky
change is that this disclosure would/might occur after the case is settled. In my opinion, it would
/supreme/docs/1604commentskoritzinsky.pdf - 2016-12-06
change is that this disclosure would/might occur after the case is settled. In my opinion, it would
/supreme/docs/1604commentskoritzinsky.pdf - 2016-12-06
State v. Douglas J. Miller
. ¶4 Miller likens this case to Walter v. United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980), where the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
. ¶4 Miller likens this case to Walter v. United States, 447 U.S. 649 (1980), where the United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3659 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
, 451 N.W.2d 752, 757-58 (1990) (citations omitted). Case law has defined “held out for public use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
, 451 N.W.2d 752, 757-58 (1990) (citations omitted). Case law has defined “held out for public use
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21