Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48351 - 48360 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
Search results 48351 - 48360 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
State v. Amber M.L.
the claimed error. We generally do not address issues raised for the first time on appeal. Shawn B.N. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13184 - 2017-09-21
the claimed error. We generally do not address issues raised for the first time on appeal. Shawn B.N. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13184 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), which makes this proscription statewide. Kinuthia claims that it is a violation of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275253 - 2020-08-05
), which makes this proscription statewide. Kinuthia claims that it is a violation of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=275253 - 2020-08-05
[PDF]
State v. David Haecker
that the “maximum sentence was wholly warranted.” On appeal, Haecker challenges his sentence, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
that the “maximum sentence was wholly warranted.” On appeal, Haecker challenges his sentence, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13375 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Sherman Williams
armed, contrary to §§ 941.30(1), and 939.63, STATS. Williams claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
armed, contrary to §§ 941.30(1), and 939.63, STATS. Williams claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9024 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
period was unreasonable as a matter of law. In support of its claim that the twenty-day period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258004 - 2020-04-15
period was unreasonable as a matter of law. In support of its claim that the twenty-day period
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258004 - 2020-04-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
and, given the facts of this case, there would be no arguable merit to a claim that the sentence was unduly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248850 - 2019-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
alleged “sua sponte” dismissal of “civil claims.” It does not appear that Henderson raised this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173142 - 2017-09-21
alleged “sua sponte” dismissal of “civil claims.” It does not appear that Henderson raised this issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173142 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consequence of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
consequence of the plea. Id., ¶12. Consequently, there is no arguable merit to a claim for plea withdrawal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219111 - 2018-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a claim upon which relief could be granted because he did not provide written documentation of all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244192 - 2019-07-23
a claim upon which relief could be granted because he did not provide written documentation of all
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244192 - 2019-07-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing Diaz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09
be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion in sentencing Diaz
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263730 - 2020-06-09