Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48371 - 48380 of 82451 for simple case.

Duffey Law Office v. Tank Transport, Inc.
Transport's counterclaim for legal malpractice. We affirm. This case is a reprise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9662 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
filed the sentence modification motion at issue in this case. In the present motion, Gentry claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48600 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
, the facts of Zellmer’s case are sufficient to constitute probable cause under County of Dane v. Sharpee, 154
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72836 - 2011-10-26

State v. Milton H. Smith
that the provisions of § 343.305(4), Stats., squarely govern this case. This statutory section dictates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15286 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” and that he was “a follower in this case for the most part.” The circuit court praised Merchant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104259 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
or deny a hearing.” Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9. ¶12 Case law has not so far provided a well
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30

State v. Richard D. Hahn
of a restricted controlled substance. Therefore, according to Hahn, the arresting officer in this case failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20364 - 2005-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
on a case cited in the jury instruction comment that held: “The general rule is that if a person performs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107933 - 2014-02-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. 1 The Harrills’ spouses are named in the case only because their marital property interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108789 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
armed. Because the record in this case is sparse, (the City of Milwaukee called no witnesses and Ols
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115245 - 2014-06-23