Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4841 - 4850 of 16449 for commenting.
Search results 4841 - 4850 of 16449 for commenting.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that Kirksey’s comments and his attorney’s comments at sentencing contradicted his current No. 2024AP674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
that Kirksey’s comments and his attorney’s comments at sentencing contradicted his current No. 2024AP674
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1043040 - 2025-11-26
State v. Edward J. Heuer
that State from recommending or commenting upon the particular sentence which the trial court should impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
that State from recommending or commenting upon the particular sentence which the trial court should impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to waive. ¶14 We also think Schwigel mischaracterizes as a “finding” of incompetence a comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
to waive. ¶14 We also think Schwigel mischaracterizes as a “finding” of incompetence a comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34660 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Rudy A. Gerardo
comment. Based upon the physical layout of the courtroom, the trial court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12759 - 2017-09-21
comment. Based upon the physical layout of the courtroom, the trial court also concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
plea decision, after Pineda-Gaeta made an initial comment that the only reason he was accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101935 - 2017-09-21
plea decision, after Pineda-Gaeta made an initial comment that the only reason he was accepting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101935 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 25
comments and schedule a public hearing. Letters were sent to interested persons on December 22, 2020
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345207 - 2021-03-09
comments and schedule a public hearing. Letters were sent to interested persons on December 22, 2020
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=345207 - 2021-03-09
COURT OF APPEALS
, 296 Wis. 2d 771, 723 N.W.2d 775, observing that the court in Huml “pass[ed] over without comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30744 - 2007-10-31
, 296 Wis. 2d 771, 723 N.W.2d 775, observing that the court in Huml “pass[ed] over without comment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30744 - 2007-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, referencing a comment made by Zurich’s attorney as to why she was not present at the first hearing, remarked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
, referencing a comment made by Zurich’s attorney as to why she was not present at the first hearing, remarked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46523 - 2010-02-01
[PDF]
State v. Michael Mirr
stated, as its comments could be construed as suggesting that Mirr had been convicted of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
stated, as its comments could be construed as suggesting that Mirr had been convicted of a crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14118 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—“a burglary and an attempt, both residential”—and commented on the previous sentencing court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
—“a burglary and an attempt, both residential”—and commented on the previous sentencing court’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15