Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4841 - 4850 of 6429 for wide.
Search results 4841 - 4850 of 6429 for wide.
[PDF]
State v. William Strong
or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13558 - 2017-09-21
or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13558 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI App 233
, that viewing a computer as a repository of potential evidence will have the wide-scale effect of abrogating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30158 - 2007-11-27
, that viewing a computer as a repository of potential evidence will have the wide-scale effect of abrogating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30158 - 2007-11-27
COURT OF APPEALS
, the defendant must demonstrate specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31982 - 2011-08-04
, the defendant must demonstrate specific acts or omissions of counsel that were “outside the wide range
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31982 - 2011-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Franklin
A trial court has wide discretion in giving instructions to a jury. State v. Coleman, 206 Wis. 2d 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2997 - 2017-09-19
A trial court has wide discretion in giving instructions to a jury. State v. Coleman, 206 Wis. 2d 199
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2997 - 2017-09-19
Douglas-Hanson Company, Inc. v. BF Goodrich Company
and failed to instruct and require the jury to find causation. Trial courts have wide discretion in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14163 - 2005-03-31
and failed to instruct and require the jury to find causation. Trial courts have wide discretion in deciding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a determination “particularly within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge.” State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
is a determination “particularly within the wide discretion of the sentencing judge.” State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010270 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant must overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32568 - 2014-09-15
the wide range of reasonable professional assistance; that is, the defendant must overcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32568 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
presumption that trial counsel’s conduct “falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285554 - 2020-09-09
presumption that trial counsel’s conduct “falls within the wide range of reasonable professional assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285554 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and conditions. The Agreement took the form of a “clickwrap” agreement, a widely used format that requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481717 - 2022-02-10
and conditions. The Agreement took the form of a “clickwrap” agreement, a widely used format that requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481717 - 2022-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
. Therefore, there is a “strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32568 - 2008-04-30
. Therefore, there is a “strong presumption that counsel’s conduct falls within the wide range of reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32568 - 2008-04-30