Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48401 - 48410 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
Search results 48401 - 48410 of 59511 for quit claim deed.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
: the court did not address Christopher’s claim that he was not fully credited for the $400 deposit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
did not claim that the circuit court’s description of those matters was incorrect, or that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
did not claim that the circuit court’s description of those matters was incorrect, or that she
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57878 - 2014-09-15
City of Chilton v. Ricki D. Bunnell
, it cannot reasonably be claimed that the trial court’s failure to suppress the breath test was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12085 - 2005-03-31
, it cannot reasonably be claimed that the trial court’s failure to suppress the breath test was harmless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12085 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but was prohibited by the “impact” clause. The circuit court rejected the Associations’ claims that the statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145354 - 2017-09-21
, but was prohibited by the “impact” clause. The circuit court rejected the Associations’ claims that the statute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145354 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.25(3)(c). The test is whether, under all of the circumstances, “‘the claim is so indefensible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204872 - 2017-12-07
809.25(3)(c). The test is whether, under all of the circumstances, “‘the claim is so indefensible
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204872 - 2017-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
considered the seriousness of the offenses, Nava’s character, including his implausible claim of self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
considered the seriousness of the offenses, Nava’s character, including his implausible claim of self-defense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34936 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of No. 2010AP2369 4 nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64001 - 2014-09-15
of No. 2010AP2369 4 nonjurisdictional defects and defenses, including claimed violations of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64001 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim of innocence. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 (1970); accord State v. Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44835 - 2014-09-15
claim of innocence. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 37-38 (1970); accord State v. Garcia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44835 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
it, we also conclude there is no arguable merit to any claim that P.C.A.’s annual review was untimely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
it, we also conclude there is no arguable merit to any claim that P.C.A.’s annual review was untimely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780038 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not provided this court with a transcript of the divorce hearing to support any of her factual claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108709 - 2017-09-21
not provided this court with a transcript of the divorce hearing to support any of her factual claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108709 - 2017-09-21