Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 48401 - 48410 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 48401 - 48410 of 59698 for quit claim deed/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. Norman claims that the thirty-five mph speed limit sign was improperly placed and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66570 - 2011-06-28
. Norman claims that the thirty-five mph speed limit sign was improperly placed and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66570 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
733, renders meritless a claim that during the plea colloquy the circuit court must inform
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
733, renders meritless a claim that during the plea colloquy the circuit court must inform
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240983 - 2019-05-20
[PDF]
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
on this claim. ¶7 Ramuta also argues that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
on this claim. ¶7 Ramuta also argues that the court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5603 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Lance L. Egner
discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges are multiplicitous. See State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7160 - 2017-09-20
discussed the methodology for reviewing claims that charges are multiplicitous. See State v. Beasley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7160 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
James Burkmaster v. Robert Wayne Heimerl
“to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21
“to declare rights, status, and other legal relations whether or not further relief is or could be claimed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12158 - 2017-09-21
Daniel Willeck v. Mrotek, Inc.
The Mroteks claim that they are entitled to immunity under Wis. Stat. § 895.481(2). Willeck contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16091 - 2005-03-31
The Mroteks claim that they are entitled to immunity under Wis. Stat. § 895.481(2). Willeck contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16091 - 2005-03-31
August 2006 Table of Unpublished Opinions
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26483 - 2006-09-11
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26483 - 2006-09-11
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 26, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
, 682 N.W.2d 839. Here, attorneys for the respondents averred that the claimed costs were necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26924 - 2005-03-31
, 682 N.W.2d 839. Here, attorneys for the respondents averred that the claimed costs were necessary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26924 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Schultz
] and for an order to suppress the evidence seized from his residence, claiming that material facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
] and for an order to suppress the evidence seized from his residence, claiming that material facts were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
be reduced after that challenge. The record belies Hamilton’s claim. The circuit court explicitly told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21
be reduced after that challenge. The record belies Hamilton’s claim. The circuit court explicitly told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117566 - 2014-07-21